NHS trust fined £200k over vulnerable girl’s death

A court found a health trust had failed to provide safe care for Ellame at Worthing Hospital.

Juliette Parkin,in Brightonand

Hsin-Yi Lo,South East

Family handout A girl with dyed red hair is smiling. She is wearing braces on her teeth. Family handout

An NHS trust has been fined £200,000 for failing to provide “safe care and treatment” for a 16-year-old girl who died on hospital grounds after fleeing her ward.

Ellame Ford-Dunn, from Upper Beeding, West Sussex, died at Worthing Hospital in March 2022 where she had been admitted.

She ran into the grounds of the hospital and was not immediately followed by a nurse because of “confusion” and a lack of appropriate procedure in place, the court heard.

Last month, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust (UHST) pleaded guilty to failing to provide safe care and treatment to Ellame which exposed her to a significant risk of “avoidable harm”.

BBC / Juliette Parkin A blonde woman in a puffer jacket and colourful scarf is holding a large photo of a girl with dyed red hair. She is standing next to a man wearing a black suit and white shirt. There are four other people standing behind them. The group is standing outside a magistrates' court.BBC / Juliette Parkin

At the sentencing on Wednesday at Brighton Magistrates’ Court, District Judge Tessa Szagun said “clear instructions to follow Ellame” if she left the ward “should have been incorporated” into the care plan.

Ellame had been under 24-hour one-to-one supervision by a registered mental health nurse on an acute paediatric ward at Worthing Hospital.

She was on that ward because there was “no alternative” and “no adequate bed” for her risk level was available, the court heard.

The prosecution accepted the trust was in a “difficult position” and would have had to turn Ellame away otherwise.

“No tier four was readily available and the high demand for such beds is a national issue,” said James Marsland, prosecuting.

Judge Szagun added: “Nothing that the defendant organisation expressed in terms of their heartfelt apology and condolence or regret at the consequences of their accepted omissions, nor any fine I impose, or indeed any sentencing remarks I make, can begin to make any difference to how her family have been impacted by the devastation and shock of this loss.”

‘No greater heartbreak’

Speaking outside the court, Ellame’s father Ken Ford-Dunn said the prosecution “recognised the significant failures” in their daughter’s care.

He remembered Ellame as a “bright firework in the dark sky” and a “loving caring soul”.

“She was deeply loved and painfully missed,” he added. “The loss of Ellame has been devastating to all who loved her.

“There’s no greater heartbreak than losing a child. But to lose a child that you believed was being kept safe, creates a pain beyond measure and a deep searing anger.”

Mr Ford-Dunn said no financial penalty could ever “match the destruction that has been caused”.

He also called for the money to be used to fund children’s mental health services.

A carpark outside a hospital.

Chief nurse Dr Maggie Davies, spokesperson for UHST, said: “The loss of Ellame was a tragedy for her and for those who loved her.

“Colleagues involved in her care remain devastated by her death and the impact it continues to have on her family and friends.”

Dr Davies added when the trust appeared at last month’s hearing, it “acknowledged the seriousness of what happened” and the “devastating impact” on Ellame’s family and friends.

“That remains true today,” she added.

“We had a responsibility to protect her while she was in our care, and we are sincerely sorry that we were not able to do that.

“Everyone accepts that people with acute mental illness should not be in general hospital wards or A&E departments, but that does not lessen our duty to keep patients safe whilst efforts are made to provide them with more appropriate care.”

Dr Davies added since Ellame’s death, the trust had made “significant improvements” to its policies, training and ward environments to “prevent anything like this happening again”.

The judge fined UHST £200,000, along with prosecution costs and a victim surcharge of £190.

Additional reporting by PA.

  • If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this story, support and advice is available via the BBC Action Line.
More on this story
Related internet links